My Info
General
Payment page
Notifications
Email Templates
Reports
Layout
Automated Reports
Customer edit (user management) [empty box = editable by user | check = not editable]
Account#
First name
Last name
Email address
Phone Number
Address
Unit
City
State
Zip
Enable high ticket disclaimer on payment page.
Default Payment Categories
for new
merchants (list separated by semicolon)
Show user balance
Show user address
Hide memo field
Disable Social network connections
Allow one click payments
Settlement Disclaimer. Please tell us what your disclaimer states.
Why expanding the College Football Playoff worked – and what still needs to be fixed <a href=https://tarakanam-net.ru/131124/novosti-vasilenko-roman-poslednie-novosti/>анальный секс смотреть</a> Now that it’s all over and the Ohio State Buckeyes are the college football national champions, it can be definitively said: expanding the College Football Playoff worked. The grand experiment to allow more teams to play for the national championship wasn’t perfect, but it ended up where it was supposed to: a worthy national champion with exciting, close games in the later rounds when the best teams faced one another. It gave us awesome scenes on campuses around the nation, created new legends and showed how a sport so steeped in tradition can evolve when faced with new demands from its fans and business partners. Here are four reasons why the new version of the College Football Playoff worked – and the areas that can still be fixed. The committee picked the right teams, even if some games were blowouts Before the games kicked off in December, much of the focus was put on the inclusion of Southern Methodist University (SMU) and Indiana University – two teams that won a bunch of games but didn’t have the brand recognition of schools like Alabama, South Carolina and Ole Miss. Here’s what else those teams had that SMU and Indiana didn’t: three losses. The Hoosiers lost only once in the regular season – to eventual national champion Ohio State. The Mustangs had lost twice, once to Brigham Young University and again in the ACC championship game to Clemson. In the first year of the expanded, 12-team playoff, could the committee really leave out a major conference team with 11 wins and punish another one for playing for a conference championship while other teams sat at home? Warde Manuel, the University of Michigan athletic director who served as chair of the committee, said they could not.
Eterminal:
Do not apply restrictions on eTerminal.
Do not apply convenience fee on eTerminal.
Allow Services Fee on eTerminal.
AutoPayments:
Allow fixed recurring payments?
Allow dynamic recurring payments?
Send AutoPay reminder.
Fixed AutoPayment Settings:
Enable setting that keeps a recurring payment cycle active even if an auto-payment is "errored" or "declined".
Limit Active AutoPayments per user to:
No limits
1
2
3
4
5
Frequency Options Allowed:
Every month
Every 3 month
Every 6 month
Every 12 month
Until Canceled
Every week
Every 2 weeks
Every 4 month
AutoPay Date Range Allowed (Beginning Date)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
AutoPay Date Range Allowed (End Date)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Dynamic AutoPayment Settings:
Dynamic recurring payments disclaimer to show in the Payment Page
Why expanding the College Football Playoff worked – and what still needs to be fixed <a href=https://tarakanam-net.ru/131124/novosti-vasilenko-roman-poslednie-novosti/>анальный секс смотреть</a> Now that it’s all over and the Ohio State Buckeyes are the college football national champions, it can be definitively said: expanding the College Football Playoff worked. The grand experiment to allow more teams to play for the national championship wasn’t perfect, but it ended up where it was supposed to: a worthy national champion with exciting, close games in the later rounds when the best teams faced one another. It gave us awesome scenes on campuses around the nation, created new legends and showed how a sport so steeped in tradition can evolve when faced with new demands from its fans and business partners. Here are four reasons why the new version of the College Football Playoff worked – and the areas that can still be fixed. The committee picked the right teams, even if some games were blowouts Before the games kicked off in December, much of the focus was put on the inclusion of Southern Methodist University (SMU) and Indiana University – two teams that won a bunch of games but didn’t have the brand recognition of schools like Alabama, South Carolina and Ole Miss. Here’s what else those teams had that SMU and Indiana didn’t: three losses. The Hoosiers lost only once in the regular season – to eventual national champion Ohio State. The Mustangs had lost twice, once to Brigham Young University and again in the ACC championship game to Clemson. In the first year of the expanded, 12-team playoff, could the committee really leave out a major conference team with 11 wins and punish another one for playing for a conference championship while other teams sat at home? Warde Manuel, the University of Michigan athletic director who served as chair of the committee, said they could not.
Frequency Options Allowed:
Every month
Every 3 month
Every 6 month
Every 12 month
Until Canceled
Every week
Every 2 weeks
Every 4 month
AutoPay Date Range Allowed (Beginning Date)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
AutoPay Date Range Allowed (End Date)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Dynamic Payment Methods Allowed
Credit Card
E-Check
Show Custom Box on top of "Make a Payment" page.
Custom Box content.
Save Settings